Legal Opinion
Nche v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1987No. 85-32PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In this appeal from his conviction of solicitation of prostitution, D.C.Code § 22-2701 (1986 Supp.), appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to prove that he had any money on him. We affirm.
To obtain a conviction for soliciting prostitution the government must prove that a defendant “(1) invited, enticed, or persuaded ... (2) a person age 16 or over (3) for the purpose of engaging, agreeing to engage, or offering to engage in sexual acts or contacts with that person (4) in return for a fee.” Graves v. United States, 515 A.2d 1136, 1145 (D.C.1986). See also D.C.Code §§ 22-2701 and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Muse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Eissa v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Browner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kelly v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rubin v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.