Legal Opinion

Lougheed v. Armstrong

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 17, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on creditor's bill to set aside fraudulent conveyances.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

The bill is filed by complainant as a judgment creditor in aid of his judgment. Belief is sought by complainant against conveyances of real estate made by Ernest Armstrong, the judgment debtor, to an intermediary and by the intermediary to the wife of the judgment debtor. At the time these conveyances were made complainant was working for Mr. Armstrong, and the major part of the money for which the judgment was subsequently recovered had been earned by complainant, but was not payable until the work should be finished; a small part of the money included in the judgment was due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milholland v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  2. McKee v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Frazer v. WesternNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. Sparrow v. ChesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. KingstonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  2. First Nat. Bank of Belleville v. MerrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. StankusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API