Legal Opinion

Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1975No. 214-70PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge

This case is presented on cross motions for partial summary judgment and raises only one of three primary questions found in plaintiff’s petition. The basic issue before us here is identical to the one found in its companion case of Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States, ante at 354. As in Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., we have a taxpayer who claims the seven percent investment credit on its entire basis in certain vessels. As in Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., taxpayer has been allowed only a restricted credit, based on its post-1961 costs, because of defendant’s interpretation of section 48(b)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartwig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Royal Indemnity Company v. The United States and Jersey State Bank, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gentry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Illinois Power Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Kansas City S. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Ulman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API