Legal Opinion

People v. Simms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763 [1993]; see also People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]; People v Hubbard, 288 AD2d 490, 490 [2001]; cf. People v Johnson, 14 NY3d 483, 486 [2010]). Prudenti, EJ., Rivera, Eng, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API