People v. Simms
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763 [1993]; see also People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]; People v Hubbard, 288 AD2d 490, 490 [2001]; cf. People v Johnson, 14 NY3d 483, 486 [2010]). Prudenti, EJ., Rivera, Eng, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012