Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hopson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 31, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Francois Circuit Court. — Hon. Chas. A. Killian, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The abstract of record reveals the fact that no bill of exceptions was filed in this case, but shows an appeal in due form from a judgment dissolving a temporary injunction. The cause is briefed by the plaintiff, the appellant here, but no brief by defendants, respondents here. The case, if properly here at all, is therefore here upon the pleadings and judgment, and not otherwise. The petition, which was verified by affidavit, thus reads:

“Plaintiff for a cause of action states that he is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land containing about nine acres in U. S. Survey No. 30991 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rothrock v. Cordz-Fisher Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Musick v. Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Cox v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Ozark Land & Lumber Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Lambert v. St. Louis & Gulf Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Ballenger v. WindesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Young v. BrassfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Dillard v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Ross v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API