Legal Opinion

Barr v. Packard Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1912No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by Harry E. Barr against the Packard Motor Car Company to set aside a compromise made with plaintiff of his claim for personal injuries. Prom an order overruling a demurrer to complainant’s bill, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is an appeal from an order, made by one of the judges of the Wayne circuit court, in chancery, overruling the demurrer of defendant to the bill of complaint in the case. Prom this bill of complaint it appears that the complainant was a minor, employed by the defendant company at work upon a drill press, and had been so employed, under the direction of the officers of defendant, for three days; that this press was not properly fastened to the floor, and the officers of the defendant knew that fact, but complainant was not notified of such condition; that on July 31, 1909, while he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Craig v. Van BebberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Gillis v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. McCarty v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Shipley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollingshead v. HollingsheadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  2. Berg v. BergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Raniak v. PokorneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Barr v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API