Hollingshead v. Hollingshead
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, &c. On motion to strike out special replication.
1Opinion of the Court
Buchanan, V. C.
Complainant has filed her bill for maintenance under the twenty-sixth section of the Divorce act, alleging that defendant is her husband, and that he abandoned her in October, 1916, and has ever since refused to support her. She further alleges that he has a yearly income of $20,000.
Defendant, by his answer, sets up two defences. In the first place, he denies that he is complainant’s husband — alleging that *263complainant on April 26tli, 1917, and subsequent to the alleged abandonment, became domiciled in and a bona fide resident of Nevada, and there instituted a suit for divorce…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In re Ellis' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Ellis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Karren v. KarrenUtah Supreme Court · 1902
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Lippincott v. LippincottNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Commonwealth v. CanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.