Legal Opinion

Whitewater Lumber Co. v. Langford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1927No. 3 Div. 787PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Maggie E. Langford sold* and conveyed certain standing timber on her lands to the Whitewater Lumber Company; her husband, R. J. Langford, joining in the deed. The deed fixed a limited time for removal of the timber, with option to_ extend or renew at the expiration of the time limit upon payment of $100 per annum for such extension. The deed contained a reverter clause.

The grantee claims the time limit fixed by the deed was seven years, and before it expired, tendered the $100 required for one year’s renewal or extension. The grantor refused the tender upon the ground that the time limit was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Barclift v. TreeceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Burgess & Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Alabama State Land Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Hill v. NelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Chitwood v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. King v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Layfield v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Stone v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API