Legal Opinion

Chitwood v. Blackwood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1929No. 6 Div. 180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

This is a suit' in ejectment under the statute by appellants against appellees. The court gave the affirmative charge for appellees. Appellants claim as heirs at law of Sarah P. Chitwood, deceased. Appellees claim under two mortgages executed by her and her husband, and a foreclosure deed. Plaintiffs filed two affidavits, one under a caption of “plea of non est factum,” and the other under a caption of “defendants’ plea,” alleging that since the execution of the mortgages they had been materially altered. The judgment entry shows that plaintiffs filed plea of non .est factum, issue was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Reynolds v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Hillens v. BrinsfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Goodlett v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Mersereau v. WHITESBURG CENTER, INCORPORATEDCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Head v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. King v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Dunn v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API