Legal Opinion

Horning v. Lindsay

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 30, 1948No. 9733PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Associate Justice.

This appeal requires us to decide between conflicting claims to the proceeds of a policy of insurance on the life of James Burns Homing. By the terms of the policy, which was issued January 12, 1926, the insurer agreed to pay, upon receipt of due proof of the death of .the insured, the sum of $5,000 to “his wife, Mary Margaret Horning, if living; otherwise to his executors, administrators or assigns.”

Mrs. Horning died in November, 1945. Her husband lived some sixteen months thereafter, and died without having changed the language of the beneficiary clause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Kindleberger v. Lincoln Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Burt v. BurtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Quick v. National Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API