Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The plaintiff paid the $6,854.75, which it seeks to recover herein, to the city of Milwaukee under protest and duress, in order to be permitted by the city to open up certain street pavements to install underground equipment required in conducting plaintiff’s business as a public utility. The city exacted that payment under an alleged ordinance which purported to authorize its commissioner of public works to grant permits to public utilities for opening street pavements or resurfaced streets, laid within three years, upon a showing that an emergency existed, provided, however, that no such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Priewe v. Wisconsin State Land & Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. La FolletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Town of Sheridan v. Valley Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API