Legal Opinion

In Re: Daryl Lantz, V Dawn Lantz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 6, 2019No. 51272-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two August 6, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II DARYL LANTZ, No. 51272-6-II Respondent, v. DAWN LANTZ, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. CRUSER, J. — Dawn Lantz appeals the superior court’s denial of her motion for reconsideration of an order granting Daryl Lantz an award for past due postsecondary support. Dawn1 argues that the court abused its discretion because the child failed to comply with the RCW 26.19.090(4) conditions. We hold that the court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm. FACTS On April 17, 2015,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. In re the Marriage of FioritoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API