Legal Opinion

United States v. Town of Nahant

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 1, 1907No. 674PublishedCited by 27 opinions

' In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

We look upon a case like this, where the government in its sovereignty exercises its right to take private or municipal property for its necessary public purposes, as somewhat exceptional in respect to rules of damage or compensation. The right to take is a strictly arbitrary right, a right without any qualification, and one which at once cuts through all individual and inferior government conditions. The federal government arbitrarily, and as a supreme entity, takes, without question, for its own necessary defenses and other public uses, whatever it lays its hand…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. United States v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Town of Bedford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  5. Campbell v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API