Legal Opinion

Pollard v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1940No. 27,449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

Curtis Pollard was charged jointly by affidavit with Harry Walker and Paul Walker with conspiracy to commit perjury. He was tried separately and found guilty by a jury, and he has appealed, assigning that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the affidavit and in denying him a new trial.

In support of his proposition that the motion to quash ought to have been sustained, the appellant calls attention to an allegation in the affidavit that the defendants conspired “to have and procure the said Harry Walker and Paul Walker to testify falsely.” (Our italics.) It is contended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Knapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bufford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. People v. KepfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. State v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Sahara Mart, Incorporated v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2018
  3. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API