Roundtree v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchwelb, Associate Judge
With due respect for Judge Steadman’s erudite opinion for the court, I am unable to join my colleagues’ disposition of this appeal. In my opinion, Roundtree did not receive a fair trial on the sodomy charge. I so conclude for two reasons. First, in spite of persuasive evidence that the complaining witness, W.D., fabricated claims of sexual abuse in the past, the trial judge precluded cross-examination of her with regard to these prior accusations. Second, the judge excluded, as “irrelevant,” proposed medical evidence about the existence of a “cheesy white extrudance” in the area of W.D.’s…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.