Legal Opinion
Roberts v. DiCarlo
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 10, 2003No. CV 03-6740 GAF (FMO)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FEESS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the objections to the Report and Recommendation. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Judgment shall be entered dismissing the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nommensen v. LundquistDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- (HC) Embry v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) KasenzangaKhona v. CanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (HC) Lavery v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) Martin v. PogueDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.