Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Hicks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the-Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was a motion for a mandamus, founded on an affidavit filed by Royal S. Hicks, the defendant in error.

The affidavit states that previous to the 28th of February, 1848, the defendant in error, as auditor of Johnson county, performed services for said county in making out tax duplicates, road tax lists, supervisor’s bonds, issuing county orders, &c., to the amount of 100 dollars and 64 cents ; that on said day he presented his account for said services, sworn to by him before a notary public, to the board of commissioners of said county and requested said board to allow and order the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Excelsior Mutual Aid Ass'n v. RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gill v. State ex rel. BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Dayton Gravel Road Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. City of Greencastle v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API