Legal Opinion

City of Scottsboro v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 5, 1983No. 81-908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case concerns an automobile accident which occurred at the intersection of Kyle and Laurel Streets in the City of Scottsboro, Alabama. Bob and Rachel Johnson contended that the City of Scottsboro allowed an unreasonably hazardous condition to exist, in that the stop sign on Kyle Street where it intersects with Laurel Street was hidden by the limbs and leaves of an elm tree. They based their suit on the theory that the accident, in which Mrs. Johnson was severely injured when the automobile in which she was riding collided with another automobile, would not have occurred absent the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Valley Min. Corp., Inc. v. Metro BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. CALVERT & MARSH COAL CO., INC. v. PassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. City of Prichard v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Tuscaloosa County v. Jim Thomas Forestry Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API