Legal Opinion

Stowell Motor Car Co. v. Hull

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover purchase price of automobiles.

1Opinion of the CourtTuthill, J.

This action, as. stated in plaintiff’s brief, is “ brought to recover $1,750.00, the balance due upon the purchase price of an Essex Sedan,” together with sundry items which are undisputed, amounting to thirty-nine dollars and nine cents.’

On November 6, 1920, the parties entered into a written contract, by the terms of which as expressed the plaintiff sold, and the defendant purchased, an Essex automobile for $2,650. The defendant was allowed on the purchase price the sum of $1,750 for a Paige car, leaving a balance of $900 which the defendant paid, and the Essex car was delivered to and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Rowland v. the New York, New Hayen & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  3. Conolly v. HyamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Tuthill v. MyrusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial Dist. Lodge No. 751District Court, W.D. Washington · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API