Legal Opinion

Rowland v. the New York, New Hayen & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 5, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for the recovery of personal property; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before F. B. Hall, J. Verdict for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff for error in the charge of the court. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.

On the 14th of August, 1889, the plaintiff, at the defendant’s freight office in Waterbury, asked the freight cashier what the rate of freight was from Waterbury to Branford, on certain described .goods. At that time such rate had been fixed and established by the defendant, and published in a book and tariff-sheet, which then hung in the office, for the information of shippers and convenient for their use. The defendant’s employees had no authority to give any other rates for carrying freight than those contained in this book and tariff-sheet, and had no means of knowing the rates except by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford & New Haven Railroad v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kearns v. AndreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. GortatowskySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Board of Regents Murray Normal School v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BundickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API