State v. Sparrow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Defendant's only assignment of error is that the trial judge, in charging the jury, “failed to give equal stress to the contentions of the defendant as required by G.S. 1-180.”
Careful study of the evidence and of the charge convinces us that the trial judge sufficiently and fairly reviewed the contentions of defendant. In relation to the facts in evidence, it was natural and reasonable that the review of the State’s contentions should take somewhat longer than the review of defendant’s contentions. The State’s principal witnesses testified in detail as to their transactions with defendant.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MaynardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.