Legal Opinion

Teiken v. Reynolds

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1995No. 94CA2036 to 94CA2039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs, Karen Teiken, Grace Williamson, Linda White, and Brenda Hearing, appeal from the trial courts’ judgments dismissing their deceptive trade practices claims against defendants Dr. Craig Reynolds, M.D., Cosmetic Surgery of Colorado, and Dr. Charles German, M.D. We affirm.

The plaintiffs filed separate actions asserting various claims arising from the manufacture and implantation of silicone filled breast prostheses. The claims against these defendants were dismissed for failure to file a certificate of review as required by §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Mallett v. PirkeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. Melville v. SouthwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Boigegrain v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Espander v. CramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Baumgarten v. CoppageColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Sussman v. StonerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  5. Chrisco v. RaemischDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API