Legal Opinion

Cognizant Worldwide Limited v. Barrett Business Services Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01848Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 COGNIZANT WORLDWIDE LIMITED and CASE NO. C19-1848-JCC COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 10 U.S. CORPORATION, ORDER 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Cognizant Worldwide Limited and 17 Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation’s (collectively, “Cognizant”) objections (Dkt. 18 No. 77) to the report and recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States 19 Magistrate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API