Herelick v. Southern Dry Goods & Notion Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Sims, P.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:
The questions presented for decision by the assignments of error will be disposed of in their order as stated.
• 1. Was the administrator guilty of a devastavit in giving the credit he gave to Berglass, for the $10,000.00 balance owing by the latter for the goods of the estate sold to Berglass by the administrator, at public auction, on the terms of all cash, but with which terms Berglass found himself unable to comply?
The question must be answered in the negative.
Section 5381 of the Code (1919), so far…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- In Re Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bliss v. SpencerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clemons v. DennisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Conte v. PilschFairfax County Circuit Court · 2009