Legal Opinion

Ford v. Ballard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1892No. 37PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Haskell. Tried below before Hon. J. V. Cockrell.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title, and for partition, instituted in the District Court of Haskell County by W. C. Ballard, A. C. Foster, Alice Tankersley and her husband Dock Tankersley, against H. C. Ford, T. W. Mays, J. E. Norton, and W. H. Campbell. . .

There was a trial without a jury, which resulted in a judgment in favor of Ballard and Foster for an undivided interest of 483f acres of the land sued for, and in favor of Alice Tankersley and Dock Tankersley for an undivided interest of 400 acres, and in favor .of the defendants severally for the other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cannon v. BoutwellTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Jenkins v. Adams & WicksTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Williams v. EllingsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Peak v. BrinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Moore v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. First State Bank of Tomball v. TinkhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Tompkins v. American Republics Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Moore v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API