Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Erath. Tried below before Hon. W. J. Oxford.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

—This is a suit iñ trespass to try title in-which the opposing parties claim the land in controversy from Mary J. Jones as the common source of title.

The facts as found by the trial court, and which we approve and adopt, show that on July 30, 1896, said Mary J. Jones, joined by her then husband, 6. A. Jones, made and duly acknowledged the following deed or instrument in writing:

“The State of Texas, County of Comanche. Know all men by these presents, that we, G. A. Jones and Mary J. Jones, wife of G. A. Jones, of the county of Comanche and State aforesaid, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breitling v. ChesterTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fogarty v. StackTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McWilliams v. RamsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Carlton v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Pico v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Frame v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. North v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Jung v. PetermannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Totten v. Pocahontas Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API