Legal Opinion

Dietz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Stephen Dietz, the appellant, was indicted and convicted for escape in the first degree in violation of Alabama Code Section 13A-10-31 (1975). He was sentenced as an habitual offender to life imprisonment. Five issues are raised on appeal.

I

Dietz contends that because his original arrest was not lawful he was not in "lawful custody" and therefore the State failed to present a prima facie case of escape and his motion for a judgment of acquittal was due to be granted.

In 1978, Dietz was convicted on two charges of burglary. He was given a ten-year sentence and ordered to serve the first…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Spakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Spakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API