Legal Opinion

Reeves v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Junior Reeves was convicted for the murder of Howard Clayton Miller and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. Five issues are raised on this appeal from that conviction.

I

Reeves contends that Emanuel Denny, David Williams, and Jimmy Williams were his accomplices and that he was entitled to pretrial disclosure of their statements under Rule 18.1 (b)(1), A.R.Cr.P. (Temp.).

A

Initially, it must be noted that "[t]he accused is ordinarily not entitled to pretrial inspection of statements of prosecution witnesses. This rule applies to statements of accomplices and co-defendants."…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ex Parte KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Jacks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Gay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Goff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API