Legal Opinion

Bitzke v. Folger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiutz, J.

In this action, which was commenced by Charles J. Bitzke against the defendants, Mary Folger and the Greenfield Laundry Service, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Laundry Company”), he charged in his complaint that the Laundry Company had failed to perform its obligations under certain settlement agreements made between the parties, and that it had entered into a conspiracy with Mary Folger to defraud the plaintiff. One agreement, which was signed by Bitzke and Mary Folger on October 4, 1935, was in settlement of an action which he had commenced against Mary Folger, her husband, and the Laundry…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Gruen Industries, Inc. v. BillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Western Oil & Fuel Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  5. Tamposi Associates, Inc. v. Star Market Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API