Legal Opinion

State v. Noonan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1976No. 59418PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant to the men’s reformatory rather than suspending sentence on the condition he be committed to the Fort Des Moines residential corrections facility. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court.

Edward Charles Noonan (defendant) pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery with aggravation [by aiding and abetting Robert William Hilding] in violation of § 711.2, The Code. The trial court denied defendant’s application for suspended sentence and ordered him committed to 25 years in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. PeckenschneiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Allan Banks Gibb IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. State v. KukowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. State v. SumpterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. State v. GrimmeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API