State v. Peckenschneider
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This appeal challenges the propriety of the trial court’s refusal to grant probation under § 789A.1(2), The Code. We affirm.
Donald Peckenschneider (defendant) entered a guilty plea to a charge of receiving stolen goods in violation of § 712.1, The Code. There is no claim the proceedings did not comply with the rules laid down in State v. Sisco, 169 N.W.2d 542 (Iowa 1969) and Brainard v. State, 222 N.W.2d 711 (Iowa 1974). Defendant limits his challenge to the trial court’s refusal to grant what is commonly called a “bench parole.” Section 789A.1(2) provides in material part:…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. CupplesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- State v. BostonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Tina Lynn ThackerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. RemmersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.