Legal Opinion
State v. Outlaw
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 6, 2008No. A07-0245PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant John E. Outlaw challenges his conviction of and sentence for first-degree burglary. Appellant argues that: (1) the district court’s determination that his out-of-state convictions are felonies under Minnesota law violated his right to a jury trial; (2) the state failed to prove that his out-of-state convictions are felonies under Minnesota law; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support his burglary conviction; (4) there was insufficient evidence that the current offense was part of a pattern of criminal conduct; (5) the prosecutor committed misconduct;…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. StrobelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. StrobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.