Legal Opinion

Smith v. Port Authority Transit

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 708PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in submitting the issue of his contributory negligence to the jury. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand for a new trial.

On July 29, 1974, appellant filed a complaint in trespass against appellee; he sought to recover for injuries sustained during a motor vehicle accident. At a jury trial in Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, appellant produced the following evidence: on June 14, 1973, at 8 a.m., appellant was traveling on East Ohio Street in the vicinity of the 31st Street Bridge. East Ohio Street is a 4 lane highway with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Howard Express Co. v. WileSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Malitovsky v. Harshaw Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Yandrich v. RadicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. McCullough v. Monroeville Home Ass'n, Post 820, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Beary v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API