Legal Opinion

Treisch v. Doster

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 9, 1930No. 7879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The plaintiff, Treisch, filed a petition against the defendants, the substance of which was that the plaintiff, owner of a tract of timber lands, executed a lease, under the terms of which he sold and conveyed, for a period of four years, to P. E. Doster, who subsequently assigned the lease to J. E. Holt, all timber upon a described tract of land “for the purpose of boxing, working, and otherwise using said timber for turpentine purposes.” ' The lease contained the further clause: “It is agreed not to cut streaks closer than three inches.” The petition alleges that the defendants have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Lott v. DentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Warlick v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henson v. Airways Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Massee & Felton Lumber Co. v. Macon Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Whitehead v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. United States v. 1,070 Acres of LandDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
  5. Butler Naval Stores Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API