Legal Opinion
Hale v. Ashcroft
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 19, 2009No. Civil Action 06-cv-00541-PAB-KLMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims as Moot [Docket No. 121]. Plaintiff is a prisoner in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). The issue before the Court is whether, despite the lifting of the Special Administrative Measures (“SAMs”) that the Attorney General had placed on plaintiff, plaintiffs original claims can be fairly read to challenge the effect of new BOP restrictions placed on him.
Plaintiff Matthew F. Hale filed a response to the motion to dismiss on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bradford v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Fletcher v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Higby v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Jefferson v. StancilDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- O'Banion v. MatevousianDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.