Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Potash Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2007No. 06-1429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

D’Anna Russo Sawyer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sawyer’s motion for stay and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawyer v. Potash Corp., 417 F.Supp.2d 730 (E.D.N.C.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sawyer v. Potash Corp. of SaskatchewanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HEDRICK v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
  2. Hudson v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local No. 150 Pension FundDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  3. Skinder v. Federal Express Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. Virginia Trader v. William Savage, III, ET AL.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026