Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Jablonski

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This bar-claim action raises the question of the effect of an error of the tax assessors in locating, on the land and tax map, the dividing line between properties. Plaintiff, Lily Conklin, except as her title was affected by the tax sale of Lot 110, Block A, Section 26, is the owner by inheritance of land encompassed by all of Lot 111 and the southernmost one quarter of Lot 110. Defendant Jablonski, the only contesting defendant, acquired title to Lot 110 by mesne conveyance from the tax sale purchaser of that lot. Defendant Jablonski moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 5) to…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Fifth Avenue Building Co. v. . KernochanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Town of BrookhavenNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Little Shoppe Around the Corner v. Carl, New York County Courts1975
  3. Steinmetz v. SteinmetzNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API