Legal Opinion

In re Town of Brookhaven

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeon D. Lazer, J.

An abstruse statute, sadly in need of reform, has combined with archaic judicial doctrine to produce (with artful human assistance) a claim of compensation for 10.24 acres of real estate by a putative owner whose deed derives from a self-created tax delinquency. While the arena is a condemnation trial, it is the validity of claimant’s tax deed which is the issue. The condemning authority, the Town of Brook-haven (“Brookhaven”), asserts that claimant’s deed begets him no title. Nevertheless, the claimant (Jack Weissman) relies *501almost entirely upon the deed, but also resists the town’s…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. National Bank of Chemung v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Westfall v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. People Ex Rel. Wallington Apartments, Inc. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melahn v. HearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. R. M. Investors Corp. v. Maggi, New York County Courts1980
  3. Salamanca Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Darrow, New York County Courts1994
  4. Sussman v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Aronauer v. St. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API