In re Town of Brookhaven
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeon D. Lazer, J.
An abstruse statute, sadly in need of reform, has combined with archaic judicial doctrine to produce (with artful human assistance) a claim of compensation for 10.24 acres of real estate by a putative owner whose deed derives from a self-created tax delinquency. While the arena is a condemnation trial, it is the validity of claimant’s tax deed which is the issue. The condemning authority, the Town of Brook-haven (“Brookhaven”), asserts that claimant’s deed begets him no title. Nevertheless, the claimant (Jack Weissman) relies *501almost entirely upon the deed, but also resists the town’s…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- National Bank of Chemung v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Westfall v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People Ex Rel. Wallington Apartments, Inc. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Melahn v. HearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- R. M. Investors Corp. v. Maggi, New York County Courts1980
- Salamanca Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Darrow, New York County Courts1994
- Sussman v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Aronauer v. St. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.