Legal Opinion

United States v. Parham

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 30, 1955No. Crim. A. No. 34591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEMAN, District Judge.

The information filed by the Government in this case charges the defendant, in substance, with possession of untaxpaid liquor in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2803(a), and possession of an unregistered still in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2810(a). Pursuant to Rule 41(e), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., defendant has filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized by Government investigators on the ground that the affidavit for the search warrant issued in this case was insufficient in failing to allege sufficient facts constituting probable cause.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LaBergeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  2. Giacomo Ventresca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  3. Giacomo Ventresca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API