Legal Opinion

Joy v. Litchfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1941No. 29896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover a balance of salary-alleged to be due under the terms of an oral contract of employment.

The plaintiff in error alleged that he had been employed by the defendant on January 13, 1934, as general manager of certain cotton compresses located in the cities of Chiekasha, Altus, and Frederick, at an agreed salary of $5,000 per year; that he had performed the duties required of him under said contract from January 24, 1934, to June 1, 1937,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cities Service Gas Co. v. EggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Lacy v. WozencraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Wolverine Oil Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Raymer v. Comley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Jayne v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API