Legal Opinion

Moll v. Bayha

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1929No. 6512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

At tbe conclusion of the evidence the court, on motion of plaintiff, instructed the jury to find for plaintiff, a verdict was returned as directed, and after the usual motion to set aside, judgment was entered on the verdict for $6,480.00 on January 17, 1929. This writ followed. Defendants asked the court for a peremptory instruction in their favor, and for other instructions, all of which were refused.

Defendants contend that they should have had a peremptory instruction, or if not, then the question of their negligence should have been submitted to the jury under proper…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Francesco v. Piney Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Wilkin v. H. Koppers Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Holton v. Clayco Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Schilling v. H. Koppers Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thorn v. Addison Bros. & Smith, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Spaulding v. Ads-Anker Data Systems—Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. Samuel Spaulding, an Infant Under the Age of 21 Years, Who Institutes This Suit by His Father and Next Friend, Junior Leroy Spaulding, and Junior Leroy Spaulding v. Ads-Anker Data Systems-- Midwest, Inc., a Corporation, Robert N. Johnson v. Ads-Anker Data Systems-- Midwest, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API