Legal Opinion

State v. Crook.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

INDICTMENT against J. W. Crook, heard by Judge W. 8. O’B. Robinson and a jury, at July Term, 1902 of the Superior Court of Union County. From a. verdict of guilty* and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Indictment for removing crop under The Code, sec. 1759. There was no conflict of evidence that the rent agreed was a 450-pound bale of lint cotton, that the cotton land was subrented by the defendant to one Bogan, that the defendant rented (1054) the land mainly for the meadow, which he himself mowed, and that he carried off the hay therefrom, and that the cotton was removed by Bogan; that no rent has been paid and no notice of removal was given. Bogan testified that he removed the cotton by order of the defendant, and the landlord testified that he never gave any consent to the removal of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bond v. . CokeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Rosenthal v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Brittain v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  4. Flynt v. . ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  5. Montague v. . MialSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Francis v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gentry v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Never Fail Land Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Brooks v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Karns v. East Central Fruit Growers Production Credit Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API