Legal Opinion

Never Fail Land Co. v. Cole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

This is an injunction proceeding.

In Hyatt v. DeHart, 140 N. C., at p. 271, the law as stated: “Ordinarily, the findings of fact by the judge below are conclusive on appeal. While this is not true as to injunction eases, in which we look into and review the evidence on appeal, still there is the presumption always that the judgment and proceedings below are correct and the burden is upon the appellant to assign and show error.” Seip v. Wright, 173 N. C., 14; Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., 32.

In Long v. Meares, 196 N. C., 212-3, speaking to the subject of the principal binding a surety on a.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seip v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. McLaurin v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Orange Trust Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Montague v. . MialSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cullins v. . State CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Cullins v. North Carolina State College of Agriculture & EngineeringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Whitaker v. . ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API