Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Allegheny County Port Authority

*501Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

I am convinced that the court below relied upon a rule of law which is clearly not applicable and palpably wrong. By its affirmance, the majority reads the word “order” in the controlling statute to encompass any action of whatsoever nature taken by an administrative tribunal for here all that the Commission has done is list for hearing 88 Transit Lines’ application.1 If this action by the Commission is an “order” within the Act of 1937, then I submit that any administrative action, however ministerial, must be. Had the Commission labeled its action…