Legal Opinion
McDowell v. Bracken
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 5, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–61535–BBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the "Motion"). See ECF No. [25]. The Court has reviewed the Motion, all supporting and opposing submissions, the record and applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brings the present action derivatively and on behalf of National Beverage Corp. ("NBC"), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KUEBLER v. VECTREN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
- Lee v. FrostDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- The Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust derivatively on behalf of Cummins, Inc. v. Cummins, Inc. Nominal Defendant, Norman T. Linebarger, Jennifer Rumsey, Gary L. Belske, Robert J. Bernhard, Bruno V. DiLeo, Stephen B. Dobbs, Daniel W. Fisher, Carla A. Harris, Thomas J. Lynch, William I. Miller, Georgia R. Nelson, Kimberly A. Nelson, Alexis M. Herman, Karen H. QuintosDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026