Legal Opinion
McNealy v. Johnston
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 30, 1939No. 22959-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, District Judge.
Petitioner first applied for a writ of habeas corpus in this District Court on January 8, 1938. At that time his petition was denied because it had been prematurely brought and petitioner was not entitled to his freedom. The decision of the District Court was affirmed in an opinion by the Circuit Court of Appeals (McNealy v. Johnston, 1938, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 280), which set forth a full statement of the issues and then concluded that petitioner was not entitled to a writ. For purposes of this present application, which was filed on March 21, 1939, a restatement of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McNealy v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Phillips v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Howard Evans Mason, Jr. And Jerry Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Polk v. ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- United States v. CliftonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1950
- Johnston v. McNealyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940