Legal Opinion

Mull v. Jeep Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1983No. L-83-256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnors, P. J.

This cause came on to be heard upon the record in the trial court. Each assignment of error was reviewed by the court and upon review the following disposition made:

This cause comes on appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and affirming a decision of the Industrial Commission, finding that appellant did not suffer a compensable occupational disease. Appellant’s appeal from the judgment of the trial court sets forth the following assignments of error:

“(1) As a matter of law, the trial court erred in granting summary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bowman v. National Graphics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Czarnecki v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. United States Playing Card Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Reed v. MTD Products, Inc., Midwest IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Job v. Cleveland Dance CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Miller v. BarryOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Steele v. Crawford Machine, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API