Legal Opinion

National Wall Paper Co. v. Columbia National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1903No. 12,930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, District Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

A statement of the facts in this case may be found in the opinion of the court upon the former appeal, 63 Neb. 234, 56 L. R. A. 121. The reason for reversing the former judgment of the district court is stated in the syllabus: “'An insolvent corporation can not make a preference of a debt due from it on which the officers and directors are bound as sureties.” The opinion closes with the following language: “There is a controversy between the plaintiff and the interveners as to their respective rights in the *48premises. The district court not having passed upon that question, the cause is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beach v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Foster v. Mullanphy Planing Mill Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Holbrook, Merrill & Stetson v. Peters & Miller Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. National Wall Paper Co. v. Columbia National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malm v. StockNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API