Legal Opinion

Holbrook, Merrill & Stetson v. Peters & Miller Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1894No. 1143PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Gov/rt, Pierce Gowity.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The respondent procured an attachment against the property of appellant, alleging as a ground for the issuance of the writ, 1 ‘ that the defendant is and has been for some time prior hereto an insolvent corporation, as affiant verily believes, and while so insolvent did, on the 21st day of June, 1893, assign and dispose by bill of sale, deeds and assignments, to the Columbia National Bank, all of its property, with intent to delay and defraud its creditors; that said attachment is not sought, and said action is not prosecuted, to hinder,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayer v. WooleryWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Child v. Western Lumber ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. National Wall Paper Co. v. Columbia National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Grinstead v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API