Legal Opinion
Micro Motion Incorporated v. Exac Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor v. Smith Meter, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 1, 1989No. 89-1099PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and NIES and BISSELL, Circuit Judges. NIES, Circuit Judge.
Smith Meter, Incorporated, seeks reversal of an order issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Erie Division, Mise. No. 732, denying its motion to quash a subpoena. 1 We conclude that Smith Meter has not established that the district court’s order is appealable. Accordingly, Smith Meter is ordered to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed.
I
Micro Motion Incorporated sued Exac Corporation in the Northern District of California for infringement of its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Johannsen v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Wi-LAN, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Jade Trading, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.